The “battlefield” of the patent-based attack and defense war, how can enterprises avoid “hot”?

The LED Lighting industry has experienced rapid development in recent years. However, after the rapid development and growth, the symptoms of the subsequent weakness of the LED industry are becoming more and more obvious. Patent has become a bottleneck for the further development of LED enterprises. From the appearance of lighting to internal structure, many domestic LED companies lacking core competitiveness will imitate and plagiarize. Seen as the only way out, many companies that focus on patent research suffer.

In the past few years, the semiconductor lighting industry has gradually got rid of the hat with low technology content. The first wave of technological innovation has been basically completed, and patents have become a powerful weapon for enterprises to open up markets and crack down on competitors.

In 2017, the number of patent litigation cases in the LED industry has increased. Among them, domestic and foreign companies such as Japan Yahua, Yiguang and Seoul Semiconductor have been making efforts in the patent battlefield.

[日亚化VS four enterprises]

In January 2017, Japanese LED manufacturer Nichia pointed out that it had filed four patent infringement lawsuits in the Federal District Court of the Eastern District of the United States on December 27, 2016, respectively suing four companies including LCD TVs and LED lighting manufacturers. the company:

(1) US LCD TV distributor TTE Technology, Inc. And its parent company TCL Multimedia Technology Holdings Limited;

(2) American LCD TV manufacturer VIZIO, Inc. ;

(3) Lowe's Home Center LLC, a US LED lighting and other product retailer, and its affiliate LG Sourcing, Inc. , which is a US distributor;

(4) American LED lighting equipment manufacturer and distributor Feit Electric Company, Inc. .

In these lawsuits, Nichia claimed that the defendant infringed on US Patent No. 9,490,411 and requested the court to issue an injunction prohibiting the defendant from selling and distributing the infringing products and requesting damages.

[日亚化VS billion light]

On January 10, 2017, Nichia issued a press release stating that the German Court of Appeal of Dusseldorf made a second-instance judgment on December 22, 2016 (case number: I-15U31/14), and recognized Everlight and its German subsidiary Everlight. The 6 white LED products of Electronics Europe GmbH infringe the Japanese YAG patent (European Patent No. EP0936682, German Correspondence No. DE69702929).

[Lynk VS Acuity Brands, Schneider Electric]

In June 2015, LED leading technology manufacturer Lynk filed a lawsuit against Juno Lighting Group and later sued Schneider Electric for infringement of its patents and defaults. After Acuity Brands acquired Juno Lighting Group, Lynk alone listed Acuity as a defendant in a patent infringement case. In the US District Court of Illinois (USDistrict Court of Illinois) for nearly two years.

March 1, 2017, Lynk Labs, Inc. Announced that the company has reached a secret settlement with Acuity Brands, Inc. and Schneider Electric's patent infringement and breach of contract lawsuit. Under the agreement, Acuity and its affiliates are licensed in part by a patent portfolio owned by Lynk Labs.

[Rui Gao VS HTC Smartphone Agent]

On March 30, 2017, Tridonic GmbH & CoKG, an affiliate of Dornbirn, and Tridonic Jennersdorf GmbH, a member of the Zumtobel Group Lighting Group, filed a lawsuit against S-KON eKontor 24 GmbH, Germany. The object of the lawsuit filed in the Munich District Court is the sale of smartphones produced by Taiwan HTC Corporation.

The BOSE alliance of Tridonic Jennersdorf GmbH, Toyota Synthetic Co., Japan, Leuchtstoffwerk Breitungen GmbH and Litec GbR in Germany has a combination of blue LED chips and yellow silicate phosphors. The basic patent for LED technology converted to white light. Rui Gao believes that the smartphones of the lawsuit infringe on several patents owned by the BOSE Alliance.

[Seoul Semiconductor VS Mouser]

On April 13, 2017, Seoul Semiconductor said that the company filed a lawsuit against the German electronic component distributor Mouser Electronics for infringing its high-power LED-related patents in the Düsseldorf District Court.

According to Seoul Semiconductor related sources, the patent infringement products are high-power LEDs produced by Everlight Electronics and most LED manufacturers, the world's top ten LED manufacturers. Mouser has become the object of this lawsuit because of the sales and circulation of LED products manufactured by these companies. In the lawsuit, Seoul Semiconductor required the infringement prohibition order, recall and destruction of infringing products and damages for these infringing products.

[Veeco VS SGL]

In April 2017, Veeco, the world's most market-selling US manufacturer, sued the graphite pallet manufacturer SGL for infringement, claiming that the company infringed on Veeco's four patents, Veeco, demanding that SGL stop selling infringing pallets and compensate for huge losses.

[晶电VS Lowe's]

On May 4, 2017, Jingdian issued a press release. The company filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Lowe's Companies, Inc. and Lowe's Home Centers, LLC at the US District Court for the District of California in the United States at 2017/04/28. In the complaint, Jingdian pointed out that Kewler Lighting and Utilitech products sold by Lowe's infringed several patents for crystal electricity, and applied for an injunction to prohibit Lowe's from continuing to sell infringing Kichler Lighting and Utilitech products.

[Mitsubishi Chemical VS Intermec]

On November 2, 2016, China Inter-American Optoelectronics (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. filed an invalidation request with the Patent Reexamination Board for the Chinese patents widely used by MCC and NIMS for red phosphors for LEDs.

On May 26, 2017, Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation and the National Research and Development Corporation's Material Materials Research Organization announced that the request for invalidation for Intermec was received on May 10, 2017, and the committee completely rejected it. The US Patent Optoelectronics maintains the validity of this patent.

[Yiguang VS Nichia, Citizen, Daguang]

On May 5, 2017, Everlight Electronics issued a press release. The company filed a patent infringement lawsuit against the Tokyo District Court on April 25, 2017, suing Nichia Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., Citizen Electronics Co., Ltd. and Daguang Electric Co., Ltd. patented technology.

Yiguang asked the court to issue an injunction against the COB products of Nichia and Citizen, as well as the large-scale automotive products equipped with the COB, including prohibition of sales, manufacturing, import and export, stock destruction and damages.

[Yiguang VS Seoul Semiconductor]

On May 8, 2017, Everlight Electronics issued a press release. The company filed a patent infringement lawsuit against the Mannheim District Court in Germany on May 4, 2017, accusing Seoul Semiconductor of infringing the patented technology of Everlight. Yiguang asked the court to issue an injunction against Seoul Semiconductor's infringing products, including prohibition of trafficking, manufacturing, import and export, recycling, inventory destruction and damages.

[nitriding VS Rayvio]

On May 23, 2017, Nitrided Semiconductor Co., Ltd. ("Nitriding") filed a patent infringement lawsuit in the federal court in the Northern District of California.

In the indictment, nitriding is seeking bans, damage and accounting, claiming that Rayvio has infringed the patent on nitriding (US 6,861,270, "Methods for the manufacture of GaN compound semiconductors and luminescent elements"), which made it product. This patented invention greatly promotes the improvement of LED luminous efficiency.

[Seoul Semiconductor VS Mouser]

On May 25, 2017, Seoul Semiconductor said that Mouser Electronics (a global electronic component distributor), which is selling LED products manufactured by Taiwan Everlight, has filed a patent infringement lawsuit against the Düsseldorf court in Germany.

[Guizhou Restar VS Chinese Technology]

On the evening of July 24, Huati Technology announced that it had received a civil lawsuit. Guizhou Lishida Lighting Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Guizhou Luxida) sued the three defendants of China Science and Technology and alleged patent infringement, involving a total amount of 32.42 million yuan.

[Puri VS billion light]

On August 1, 2017, BridgeLux filed a countersuit against Yiguang in the North District Court of California, requesting compensation for past and current patent losses, and requested to prohibit Yiguang from continuing to sell related products in the United States. Purui believes that Yiguang's products, including 2835 and COB, infringe on four patents including Puri's US Patent Nos. 6,869,812, 8,567,988, 8,256,929 and 8,092,051.

[Seoul Semiconductor VS American Lighting Company]

Seoul Semiconductor and its subsidiaries said on September 19 that the US LED lighting company, which infringes subsidiary Acrich technology and sells its products, has filed a patent infringement lawsuit in the federal court in California.

Seoul Semiconductor said in a complaint that several LED lights, including filament LED lamps, sold by Archipelago Lighting, Inc., infringe on 12 related patents of Seoul Semiconductor. The infringed Seoul Semiconductor Acrich patents include high-voltage drive LED drive technology, multi-chip manufacturing and multi-junction technology (MJT), LED packaging, filament LED manufacturing technology, LED epitaxial growth and chip manufacturing technology, all of which manufacture and drive LEDs. The necessary core technology.

[Li energy lighting VS a light source factory]

Lineng Lighting sued a lighting patent infringement case of Zhongshan Lighting Co., Ltd. and Zhongshan Guzhen Lighting Appliance Factory (2016 Yue 73 Minchu 1476) finally fell, Lieneng Lighting has received the Civil Judgment of Guangzhou Intellectual Property Court And the "Certificate of the Effectiveness of the Judgment Document" and other documents.

In the case, the Guangzhou Intellectual Property Court ruled that Lieneng Lighting won the case, and the defendant Zhongshan Lighting Co., Ltd. and Zhongshan Guzhen Lighting Appliance Factory infringed the design of the “decorative cover (LED bulb)” design patent (application number ZL201430491047. 3) The facts are true.

【晶电VS All Star Lighting Supplies】

On October 19, Jingdian announced that the LED filament light bulb products sold by the All Star Lighting Supplies brand under the Luxrite brand infringe on several US patents for crystal power, so it has been in the United States District Court in New Jersey. The District Court for the District of New Jersey filed a patent infringement lawsuit and applied to the court to issue an injunction prohibiting All Star Lighting Supplies from continuing to sell infringing products.

[Overclocking three VS Shenzhen An Hui, Dongguan An Hui, Jing Richeng]

On November 10th, overclocking three issued an announcement. The company was in Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court against Shenzhen Anhehui Lighting Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Shenzhen Anhehui”) and Dongguan Anhehui Lighting Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Dongguan Anhui”), Shenzhen Jingricheng Lighting Technology Co., Ltd. (referred to as “Jingricheng”) filed a lawsuit against the company’s intellectual property rights.

Overclocking III believes that Shenzhen Anhehui, Dongguan Anhehui production and sales of "plastic aluminum floodlights", "ultra-thin floodlights" and other products use the overclocking three owned invention patent "LED lamps" (patent No.: ZL201410214558.X), utility model patent "LED lamp" (patent number: ZL201220526723.1), design patent "projection light (TG3) (patent number: ZL201530266624.3), utility model patent "projection lamp and The technical scheme of the four patents of its fasteners (Patent No.: ZL201520878797.5) is an infringing commodity infringing the above patent rights of the company.

Written at the end:

Most of the current technology patents in the LED industry are in the hands of large enterprises. Therefore, the authorization of patents through patent cross-licensing or other means is the primary priority, but this is not secure. For enterprises, the core technology is mastered. It is the safest in your own hands.

Perhaps, the acquisition of patents by means of purchase is also an effective way, such as NVC 500 million acquisition of new generation of LED semiconductor technology international patents. However, it is the key for enterprises to improve their R&D capabilities. Only when they have patents can they have the refusal to plagiarize and let the company go fast and steady.

In addition, from a policy perspective, the government should increase support for small and medium-sized enterprises that lack the strength of patent research, and improve the research strength of small and medium-sized enterprises is an effective measure to truly reduce the phenomenon of patent infringement in the industry. At the same time, promote industry self-discipline and reduce the industry's tolerance for plagiarism.


Portable Power Station

Portable power system ,Portable power storage,Portable solar system, Outdoor power station, Portable power station

SHENZHEN CHONDEKUAI TECHNOLOGY CO.LTD , https://www.szfourinone.com