Top 5 "overstated" electronic products on 3D TV

According to foreign media reports, after the global financial crisis in 2009, the technological innovation of electronic products ushered in a great recovery in 2010, and a series of new products and new technologies followed. However, at the same time of innovation, many new products will inevitably face a situation of failure. Even some products that seem to be very successful, such as the Apple iPad, are actually overstated. This article lists the top 5 most exaggerated in this year. product.

5th Place: Apple iPad

Many people may think that choosing the Apple iPad is controversial because its sales have always been promising, reaching 7 million units in sales in the six months since its debut. At the same time, its impact on the entire computer industry has been more than any of the past 10 years. The impact of the product is great.

However, there is a reason why the iPad has been selected as an overstated product. Quite a number of users hope that the iPad will be a replacement for notebooks, but in fact, it can only implement some complementary accessory features. Although Apple's handheld computers have already gone out of the market for low-end laptops (especially the Internet), many iPad users actually hope to buy more portable PCs.

The iPad is useful for business executives who are surrounded by meetings all day long. People in the consulting industry also need the product. In addition, it is a good assistant tool for field workers who need to communicate face-to-face with customers. However, for most users, their daily work still needs to sit down and finish on the computer, and the iPad will no doubt be of little use at this point.

Fourth place: Microsoft Kinect

Before Kinect has yet to come out, Bill? Gates has talked about it several times. When the Nintendo Wii came out, Gates immediately said that the Wii is not a true technological innovation. The real innovation is that when you play a virtual tennis game, you hold your own tennis racket instead of a game controller.

Microsoft soon turned this innovative idea into a real Microsoft Kinect and added it to the existing Xbox 360 game console. The Xbox 360 equipped with Kinect allows players to personally experience jumping into video games, getting over obstacles, and shooting in their own room without actually kicking bad things at home. This kind of immersive feeling is really great.

However, the biggest drawback of this product is its inability to function properly in sunny rooms. It can only be used in basements and dimly lit rooms. Because face recognition does not work properly when the light is too bright, the action-guided navigation menu will also run very slowly. Kinect is indeed an innovation, but there are still disadvantages that need to be improved. There are still many problems in the actual operation.

Third place: Samsung Galaxy Tab

The biggest innovation of the Samsung Galaxy Tab is its introduction to the Pocket PC in the Android system. All along, the wave of Android handhelds that people are expecting has been delayed. The main reason is that Google has not yet released a Pocket PC-based Android, and other vendors have also dismissed the development of their own Android handheld computers. Thoughts.

Samsung has created a 7-inch-thick Galaxy Tab Android PDA based on its original Galaxy S series Android smartphone. The hardware performance of the product is very superior, but there are some problems with the software in Shanghai, making it clearly not worth the money. The Galaxy Tab is considered by the industry to be the first competitor of the Apple iPad. However, users who are interested in purchasing are best to wait and see prices drop, or other developers will launch similar Android handheld products in the first half of 2011.

Second place: Google TV

The most disappointing technology in 2010 was Google TV. The program in Google TV achieves conversion of entertainment programs by lowering the threshold of interactive channels that support multimedia technology. If Google was not initially focused on providing Internet TV services, but instead focused on using Android applications for flat-screen TVs, Google TV may now be very successful.

However, Google TV still has room for change, but it requires a fundamental shift in strategy. Before the company blindly sought to graft Google TV and online video through traditional lines and satellites, the program selector provided to users was just a box. The users are puzzled by this operation. If it is simply to look at a web page or an online video, you can connect to a computer. Why bother? Of course, if you want to watch network-made programs or videos on TV, you need to use this Slingbox.

First place: 3D TV

TV vendors have been clamoring for 3D TVs in recent years and are constantly introducing new 3D TVs and glasses. The problem is that this product is lacking.

In January of this year, TV suppliers pointed out that 3D TV will be the mainstream of future TV development, and consumers are encouraged to purchase new 3D TVs and adapters to replace newly purchased flat-panel TVs. However, media reports show that consumers do not want to follow the ideas of these businesses, they do not want to replace the newly purchased TV, but do not want to wear 3D glasses every time watching TV. Although vendors have not yet given up on the promotion of this technology, 3D TVs will no doubt fail to see bright development prospects.