Hello everyone, I'm Ryan. I have been working on home appliances sales for 12 years. I have been using it for 5 years. I've learned that it's worth buying a platform. I've been writing some recent articles myself. I hope you can help everyone to choose the right one for you. TV, the following text is the essence, please read patiently. (This post is non-advertisement)
About this post: This post is a comparison of the mainstream models of Sony brand television screens. As for why there are no other brands for horizontal comparison, there are two reasons: The first point:The three Sony TVs in the screen shot are basically invincible among all the brands in the corresponding price range of the model, and there is no better choice than them.
Second point: Because this post was originally intended only for Sony, but it does not matter, there will be a Sony VS Samsung VS LG's flagship model screen contrast before August 20.
In fact, I have been tangled in the shooting process of these machines because the comparison of the high school, the low school and the high school in the brand is a bit of a nonsense. There is basically no cost-effectiveness in the high school and the low end of the brand. Money was lost, so I was confused during the filming process. I felt like I didn't need to shoot this, but I ended up filming because I found that many people had differences between the Sony X9300E X9000E X8000E and some of the parameter descriptions on the official website. For example, Knowing that the X9300E is an advanced version of the 4K X1 and the 9000E and 8000E are all ordinary 4K X1s, there is no concept of what effect these differences will bring. Therefore, it is decided to shoot these comparisons so that everyone can see the changes in these parameters at a glance. What are the actual changes in image quality?
------------
It was also stated in advance that because the camera was bad and 3 TVs were photographed together, there was a certain amount of shrinkage in performance and optimization of the features.
All the pictures in this post are relative to the actual shrinking and optimization features as follows:
X9300E: The camera can't capture the details of the highlights and highlights of the machine, and the details of the shadows. The overall performance is reduced by 30% compared to the real machine.
X9000E: The camera can't capture the highlight detail and shadow details of the perfect state of the machine, and the overall performance is reduced by 30% compared to the real machine.
X8000E: Although the camera can't capture the dark details of the perfect state of the machine, it greatly reduces the fog problem in the standard mode of this machine, increasing the 10% picture quality.
------------
About 4K X1 chip:
As we all know, the X9300E chip is an advanced version of the 4K X1 chip, and the X9000E chip is a 4K HDR X1 chip. The X8000E does not have an X1 chip. The difference between these two chips is that which color can be detected by the advanced version of the 4K X1 chip. Deep, which colors are light. Therefore, each color can be individually adjusted while maintaining various color levels and taking advantage of the wide color gamut panel. In other words, it is this chip that can distinguish each color in a picture, and then adjust it to make the originally darker color deeper and the lighter color lighter. The 4K HDR X1 chip is designed for color matching on one screen, and unlike the X1 chip's advanced version, it separates parts of the screen to partially colorize the screen. Therefore, the 4K HDR X1 of the X9000E can clearly express the depth of the screen. The relationship, but not as prominent as the X9300E, is fully reflected in all screen shots.
The TV shows that any picture should have a brightest light source. The X9300E's amazing thing is that it can perfectly reflect light changes without losing any highlight details. The X9000E does not have an X93E for highlights. Performance, but there are also obvious differences, X8000E completely lost all the highlights, so that all sunny days look like cloudy. The whole picture does not look light. This is mainly related to the HDR peak brightness of the TV.
It is recommended that all images be enlarged. The comparison of skin color can completely see the advantages and disadvantages of each color control.
This picture shows sand
This picture shows the X8000E is very close to the real machine performance, the background is blue
The last wave of PS4 games: (Insert here, play PS4 to buy Sony TV, the best compatible optimization.)
Let's talk about the HDR function in the game. It is recommended that you do not open it. The camera should be in RGB mode. The HDR of the TV should not be opened. Because few games are native HDR productions, the HDR function will only be affected by various exposures. Watching movies to play HDR movies to native HDR games can only reflect its real effects.
As shown in the above figure, playing HDR in a non-native HDR game basically eliminates all grayscale performance and forcibly increases brightness and darkness contrast and color gamut, so after the color rich game has been forcibly raised, the color begins to fluctuate. . So it is not recommended to open it. The following figures are all standard mode non-HDR modes.
Horizon screen comparison:
Shenhai 4 This set of charts, X9300E's performance is closer to the reality, blue sky, blue sky and sun, the color performance is also normal, so the TV in the better the game the greater the difference, a good TV signal all the information can be performed, not good The TV will always lose this lost one. Everyone carefully looks at the details of the wall. The X8000E loses so many details and the outline is lost. The X9000E's detailed outline is consistent with the X9300E. The color performance is determined by the chip. The solution.
------
Disadvantages of the X9300E: In the absence of color parameter adjustment, the color performance will be more conspicuous, but the color scale is too full, occasionally some of the sources, the face will be reddish, or other colors will be too bright. This can only be fine-tuned based on different sources. Play PS4 delay slightly higher.
X9300E Advantages: HDR brings a high dynamic range, highlighting the picture is particularly good, this rare highlight is close to the kind of natural light, not just a software overexposed, and highlight the details of the perfect reservation. Gray-scale control is also in place. There was no such thing as a dark gray part of the D-series last year. The entire picture structure cannot pick up too many shortcomings. And the sense of three-dimensionality and contours are also very strong. The dynamics are also very smooth. It can be said that the performance of the X9300E this year was a bit out of my expectation. It feels like Sony is starting to find some balance.
--------------------
Disadvantages of the X9000E: It is a bit difficult to summarize the shortcomings of the X9000E, because there are many disadvantages compared to the X9300E, but considering the price comparison with the X8000E and other brands, I really can't tell you what are the disadvantages. If you really want to say, there will be insufficient highlights and the color gradation will not be full and bright. There are still noticeable differences from the X9300E. But it's normal, but what's the price difference? This wave of conceding defeat, X9000E shortcomings do not know how to sum up.
X9000E Advantages: This price point is too much of a good thing, who TM said this is a replacement for the X8500D's camera? Is this obviously an upgraded version? Although the lack of HDR peak brightness is missing some of the highlights of the X93E, but people have everything ready, the details are not lost, a strong sense of contour, dynamic performance and X93E like, what do you want? Although the overall performance is indeed not as good as the X93E, horizontal contrast has no rival.
--------------------
Disadvantages of X8000E: The background is bluish, this is difficult to save by late debugging, and the panel is fogged. (The problem of fogging can be saved by increasing the gamma value. Different gamma sources can be used to improve the gamma. Adding color cast causes the overall picture to appear blue fog, and the detail loss is more obvious. Many of the details that can be seen on the X9000E X9300E are pasted on the X8000E, the outline is not strong, the dynamic trailing is obvious, and the brightness is not high. However, the highlight details were lost. Not only the brightness is not high, there is no obvious direct highlight performance at all, and many noonday sunshine has become cloudy, which is still very much affected. Because there is no correct sense of sunlight, the overall composition of the picture quality has no small effect.
X8000E Advantages: It is said that the lean dead camel is bigger than Ma Da. This model, which is currently the cheapest in the Sony E series 55-inch model, has various disadvantages, but it also has many advantages, such as inheriting the wide color. Domain, this is with Terricolor charm chip, so the above screen shot you can see, color saturation, no problem, and although there is no 4K X1 chip, color control in addition to the default background is blue, but not much The problem, we see the first picture of the green dove know, that figure's performance in Samsung's new flagship Q8C is completely invisible to the pigeons, only to see a green. And the overall picture is not lost in the three-dimensional sense, there is no obvious feeling of a very flat picture quality, this point to Sony's point of praise, because the three-dimensional image of this issue many brands of high-end models is not as good as X8000E, and the biggest problem of this model is innate The lack of sexual gamma, it is recommended to buy this machine users, to increase the gamma first hand, at least to improve the performance of this machine 20%. In addition, X8000E is watching Haimei Di, and other online video, the color is not too bad, because of the time I did not shoot, there are a lot of screen X8000E's performance is still relatively good, more natural. Just watching Blu-ray movies, playing games, and dark performance, the shortcomings of the X8000E will be more obvious. Similarly, horizontal brand models have no rivals.
--------------------
Because X9000E and X8000E price difference of 1500 yuan, so here to talk about how much the X9000E contrast increases, X9000E contrast X8000E is mainly the elite light control and X1 chip as well as the direct type of backlight credit.
X8000E fog, X9000E fog
X8000E blue, X9000E color is normal
X8000E obvious trailing, X9000E dynamic fluency
The X8000E loses some details and the X9000E hardly loses
8000E outline (contour sense is the definition of the edge of the object, can be understood, for example, the fourth picture of the sea of ​​God 4, the edges of the few bricks the protagonist is hanging on, the X90E and X93E are very clear, and the X80E is fuzzy ) Not as good as the X9000E
The X8000E has almost no high-light performance. The X9000E does not, and the X8000E does not look cloudy and sunny. The X9000E can see that the X9300E is very close to reality.
--------------------
In addition, if everyone likes blue sky, big sun, please choose X9300E, X9300E's light performance, even I like it.
--- Codeword code for 3 hours, tired, rest, everyone more messages and more questions, I have been in, the next screen shot, 65X9300E Vs 65Q8C, upload before August 20.
Description of Antenk's Slim D-Sub Connector
D-Sub Connector Slim is a space-saving D-sub Socket Connector with an 8.54mm depth. The slim 8.54mm depth reduces the board mounting area by 33% as compared with standard models. The Slim Profile D-Sub Connectoroffering includes D-sub sockets with nine right-angle DIP terminals and a mounting board thickness of either 1.6 mm or 1.0 mm (from difference in lock pin structure). RoHS compliant, Slim D-Sub Connector offers a 3A rated current, 300VAC rated voltage, and an insertion durability of 100 times within an operating temperature range of -25º to 105ºC.
Features of Antenk's Slim D-Sub Connector
Board mounting area is reduced by 33% (compared with standard models) using a depth of 8.4mm
D-sub sockets with nine right-angle DIP terminals
Mounting board thickness of either 1.6mm or 1.0mm (from difference in lock pin structure)
RoHS Compliant
Applications of Antenk's Slim D-Sub Connector
Factory Automation
Machine Tools
Power SuppliesMedical Tools
Test & Measurement
LSI/FPD Manufacturing Systems
Information Transmission Tools
Security Tools
Industrial Tools
Slim D SUB Connector,High Density D-Sub Connector Slim, Solder type D-Sub Connector Slim,Right Angle D SUB Connector Slim, slim profile 90°- SMT D SUB Connector,9 15 25pin slim profile 90°- THT D SUB Connector
ShenZhen Antenk Electronics Co,Ltd , https://www.antenkconn.com